Skip to Main Content U.S. Department of Energy
Fundamental Science Directorate
Page 111 of 382

Atmospheric Sciences & Global Change Division
Research Highlights

March 2013

Reaching Ambitious Greenhouse Gas Concentration Goals

Technology improvements reduce cost of reaching goals, but not essential to meet them

Climate change word cloud
While technology improvements can reduce the cost of reaching the ambitious greenhouse gas concentration goals set by the international community, this study shows they are not essential to meet those goals. Enlarge Image.

Results: Researchers at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory found that even though it is technically possible to reach ambitious goals to limit greenhouse gas concentrations by the end of the 21st century, the combined effects of limitations in technology availability and uneven global participation to curb emissions will affect costs. In addition, if the world's largest greenhouse gas emitters do not take any action to reduce emissions by the end of the century, those ambitious goals are impossible to reach no matter how much energy technologies improve.

"Our findings contrast with many previous studies that found bioenergy-carbon capture and storage technologies (BECCS) to be essential to reach ambitious greenhouse gas concentration goals," said Dr. James Edmonds, Battelle Fellow and researcher at PNNL, working at the Joint Global Change Research Institute (JGCRI) in Maryland. "This study shows that while not essential, BECCS could help to substantially reduce the cost of achieving ambitious greenhouse goals."

Why It Matters: The international policy community has set ambitious goals to limit greenhouse gas concentrations. Achieving these goals would require dramatic changes to the global energy system. But what are the choices, and what is the impact if implementation is limited? The research presented in this paper explored the role of technology and terrestrial Earth systems, as well as interactions between energy technology, land, and policy to illuminate more clearly the range of options available and cost consequences.

Methods: A PNNL research team led by Edmonds and working at JGCRI used the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM) to examine hypothetical scenarios in which human-caused greenhouse gas emissions may be constrained to limit year 2100 atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations to 450 ppm CO2-e (see sidebar, What is CO2-e?). GCAM, developed at PNNL with support from the U.S. Department of Energy, is an integrated assessment model that links economic, energy, land-use and climate systems to show the effects of global change. Using alternative assumptions about technology performance and possible international climate policy decisions, the team investigated the role of technology performance, terrestrial Earth systems, and policy decisions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

They found that while bioenergy and carbon capture and storage technologies may help manage the cost, they are not essential to reaching ambitious climate change goals. Several additional important findings include:

  • The ability to sequester carbon in forests and soils is potentially large and comparable in magnitude with amounts of carbon removed from industrial processes for geologic storage. Land-use systems can be an important component of a larger strategy to limit climate change.
  • Energy technology performance improvements lowered the economic cost of reaching ambitious climate goals, as did early participation by all nations. The combined effects of technology use and policy decisions had the potential to change costs substantially.
  • If large-emitter regions failed to reduce emissions at all during the 21st century, ambitious goals were impossible regardless of how good energy technologies became.

What's Next? Researchers are conducting further studies to understand the interactions between energy, land and water.

Acknowledgments:

Sponsor: This research was supported by sponsors of the Global Energy Technology Strategy Program. Research employed the Global Change Assessment Model whose development is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science as part of the Integrated Assessment Research Program.

Research Team: James Edmonds, Patrick Luckow, Kate Calvin, Marshall Wise, James Dooley, Page Kyle, Son Kim, Pralit Patel and Leon Clarke at PNNL.

Research Area: Climate & Earth Systems Science

Reference: Edmonds JA, PW Luckow, KV Calvin, MA Wise, JJ Dooley, GP Kyle, SH Kim, PL Patel, and LE Clarke. 2013. "Can Radiative Forcing Be Limited to 2.6 Wm-2 Without Negative Emissions from Bioenergy AND CO2 Capture and Storage?" Climatic Change. DOI:10.1007/s10584-012-0678-z.


Page 111 of 382

Fundamental & Computational Sciences

User Facilities

Research Areas

Divisions

Additional Information

Research Highlights Home

Share

Print this page (?)

YouTube Facebook Flickr TwitThis LinkedIn

What is CO2-e?

All greenhouse gases are not created equal. While carbon dioxide (CO2) is the primary greenhouse gas affecting global warming, it's not the only one. Each warming gas in the atmosphere has a different potential to influence the greenhouse effect. Scientists and policy makers need a way to describe all greenhouse gases in terms of a single unit of measure. That unit is carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO2-e. This measure gives global change researchers and policy makers a common language to describe the combined effect of all greenhouse gases.

Contacts