Contaminants in fish and wildlife species that inhabit the Columbia River and Hanford Site are monitored for several reasons. Wildlife have access to areas of the Site containing radioactive contamination, and fish can be exposed to contamination in spring water entering the river along the shoreline. Fish and some wildlife species exposed to Hanford effluents might be harvested and may potentially contribute to the dose people receive. In addition, detection of radionuclides in fish and wildlife may indicate that wildlife are entering restricted contaminated areas (for example, burrowing in burial grounds) or that radioactive material is moving out of these restricted areas (for example, through blowing dust). Consequently, samples are collected at various locations annually, generally during the hunting or fishing season, for selected species (Figure 5.5.1).
Many of the operating facilities residing near nuclear facilities are buffered by natural areas, such as the ALE Reserve. These buffer zones isolate nonnomadic species on the Hanford Site (for example, rabbits) from contact with the public. Therefore, these species are not hunted. More detailed rationale for selection of specific species sampled in 1994 can be found in DOE (1991b).
When radionuclides are found in fish or wildlife, it is important to determine what fraction of those radionuclides originated at Hanford. Therefore, samples of fish and wildlife collected from distant locations unaffected by Hanford effluents (background locations) are analyzed, and results are compared to results from Hanford samples to identify any differences. Routine background sampling is conducted roughly every 5 years at locations believed to be unaffected by Hanford releases. Background data may also be collected during special studies or sampling efforts. In 1994, background concentrations were measured in carp from Vantage, pheasants from the Yakima Valley, and deer from offsite.
For each species of fish or wildlife, radionuclides are selected for analysis based on the potential for the contaminant to be found at the sampling site and the potential to accumulate in fish or wildlife (Table 5.5.1). Cesium-137 and strontium-90 have been the most frequently measured radionuclides in fish and wildlife.
Strontium is chemically similar to calcium; consequently, it accumulates in hard tissues high in calcium such as bone, antlers, and egg shells. It has a long biological half-life in hard tissue and may profile the lifetime exposure of an organism to strontium-90. However, strontium-90 in wildlife samples generally does not contribute much to human dose because it does not accumulate in edible portions of fish and wildlife. Spring water in the 100-N Area is the primary source of strontium-90 from Hanford to the Columbia River; however, the current contribution, relative to historical fallout from atmospheric weapons testing, is small (Jaquish 1993).
Cesium is particularly important because it is chemically similar to potassium and accumulates in the muscle tissue of fish and wildlife. It is more likely, therefore, to contribute to the dose received by hunters and fishers from the consumption of game and fish. It has a relatively short biological half-life and is an indicator of more recent exposure to radioactive materials. Cesium-137 is also a major constituent of historical fallout.
Fish and wildlife samples were analyzed by gamma scan to detect a number of gamma emitters (see Appendix F). However, gamma scan results for most radionuclides are not discussed below because concentrations were too low to measure or because measured concentrations were considered artifacts of low background counts. Low background counts occur at random intervals during sample counting and can produce occasional spurious results.
Other specific radiochemical analyses were performed on fish and wildlife samples to measure plutonium-238, plutonium-239,240, technetium-99, uranium-234, uranium-235, and uranium-238. These radionuclides provide an indication of contaminant levels in edible portions of fish and wildlife and are useful when estimating doses to consumers. These radionuclides are important because:


Muscle (fillet) samples and offal (referred to as carcass samples in past reports) samples were collected for analysis of gamma emitters and strontium-90.
The mean concentration of strontium-90 in bass
offal was
(see Appendix A,
Table A.11). These results were lower than the mean
concentration observed in bass offal samples
collected from 1989-1993 (
).
There has been a general reduction in strontium-90
concentrations measured in bass offal since 1986
(Poston 1994); however, the changes in the last 5
years have been small because concentrations are
very close to background levels (Figure
5.5.2).

Muscle. Strontium-90 was not detected in carp muscle samples from Vantage, the 100 Areas, or the 300 Area (MDC = 0.005 pCi/g). Cesium-137 also was not routinely detected in muscle samples (see Appendix A, Table A.11); however, there were several instances of cesium-137 detected at the MDC of 0.02 pCi/g (Bisping 1995). Concentrations of both radionuclides in carp muscle are hovering at the MDC, and there is no indication of accumulation of cesium-137 above background levels in carp muscle.
Offal. Concentrations of strontium-90 in carp offal
were higher in samples collected at Vantage than in
samples collected at either the 100-N to 100-D
Areas or the 300 Area (see Appendix A, Table
A.11). The maximum observed concentration of
strontium-90,
, was found in
an offal sample collected from the 300 Area.
Concentrations of strontium-90 in offal samples
from Vantage generally exceeded concentrations
reported in Hanford Reach carp offal samples
collected in 1994; however, the range in
concentrations at each sampling area is similar.
Cesium-137 was measured in half of the muscle samples collected between the 100-N and 100-D Areas and in none of the samples from the 300 Area (see Appendix A, Table A.11). Concentrations over the past 6 years have remained near the minimum detectable concentration (0.02 pCi/g).
No other manmade radionuclides were detected in 1994 whitefish muscle samples (Bisping 1995).